# FAQ: Why is the number one not prime?

The number one is far more special than a prime! It is the
unit (the building block) of the positive integers, hence the only integer which merits its
own existence axiom in Peano's axioms. It is the only multiplicative identity
(1·*a* = *a*·1 = *a* for all numbers *a*). It is
the only perfect *n*th power for all positive integers *n*. It is the only
positive integer with exactly one positive divisor. But it is not a prime. So
why not? Below we give four answers, each more technical than its
precursor.

If this question interests you, you might look at the history of the primality of one as described in our papers: "What is the smallest prime?" [CX2012] and "The History of the Primality of One: A Selection of Sources" [CRXK2012]. These papers survey the history of the concept of prime and of the number one. It may surprise you to learn that for most of history one was not even considered a number (but rather "the source of number"), so was obviously not considered prime. This should probably be added to this page as another reason one is not considered prime: by historical use.

**If you want far more depth and history, read the first of these two scholarly papers--they are both easily accessible on the web!**

### Answer One: By definition of prime!

The definition is as follows.An integeris called agreater than oneprime numberif its only positive divisors (factors) are one and itself.

Clearly one is left out, but this does not really address the question "why?"

### Answer Two: Because of the purpose of primes.

The formal notion of primes was
introduced by Euclid in his study of perfect
numbers(in his "geometry" classic *The Elements*). Euclid needed to know
when an integer *n* factored into a product of *smaller* integers (a nontrivial
factorization), hence he was interested in those numbers which did not factor. Using
the definition above he proved:

**The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic**- Every positive integer greater than one can be written
as a product of primes, with the prime factors in the product written in order of nondecreasing size.*uniquely*

Here we find the most important use of primes: they are the unique building blocks of
the multiplicative group of integers. In discussion of warfare you often hear the
phrase "divide and conquer." The same principle holds in mathematics. Many of
the properties of an integer can be traced back to the properties of its prime divisors,
allowing us to divide the problem (literally) into smaller problems. The number one
is useless in this regard because *a* = 1^{.}*a* =
1^{.}1^{.}*a* = ... That is, divisibility by one fails to
provide us any information about *a*.

### Answer Three: Because one is a unit.

Don't go feeling sorry for one, it is part of an important class of numbers call the
**units** (or **divisors of unity**). These are the elements (numbers) which
have a multiplicative inverse. For example, in the usual integers there are two units
{1, -1}. If we expand our purview to include the Gaussian integers
{*a*+*bi* | *a, b* are integers}, then we have four units {1, -1, *i*,
-*i*}. In some number systems there are infinitely many units.

So indeed there was a time that many folks defined one to be a prime, but it is the importance of units in modern mathematics that causes us to be much more careful with the number one (and with primes).

### Answer Four: By the Generalized Definition of Prime.

(See also the technical note in The prime Glossary' definition).

There was a time that many folks defined one to be a prime, but it is the importance of units and primes in modern mathematics that causes us to be much more careful with the number one (and with primes). When we only consider the positive integers, the role of one as a unit is blurred with its role as an identity; however, as we look at other number rings (a technical term for systems in which we can add, subtract and multiply), we see that the class of units is of fundamental importance and they must be found before we can even define the notion of a prime. For example, here is how Borevich and Shafarevich define prime number in their classic text "Number Theory:"

An elementpof the ring D, nonzeroand not a unit, is calledprimeif it can not be decomposed into factorsp=ab, neither of which is a unit in D.

Sometimes numbers with this property are called **irreducible** and then the name
prime is reserved for those numbers which when they divide a product *ab*, must divide
*a* or *b* (these classes are the same for the ordinary integers--but not always
in more general systems). Nevertheless, the units are a necessary precursors to the
primes, and one falls in the class of units, not primes.